Edvisable is AI-assisted proposal development the PI controls. It helps draft wherever the funding agency allows it — with suggestions grounded in your institution's real research record and a citation behind every claim — and nothing enters the proposal until a human accepts it. The result: better proposals, compliant and accurate, in a fraction of the time.
Your proposal archive, publications, past and current awards, facilities and equipment descriptions, and biosketches enter one governed knowledge base — each item carrying its source, date, and permissions. This is the raw material everything else is built from.
Edvisable watches funding calls across NSF, DoD broad agency announcements, DOE, NASA, and foundations, and scores them against your actual strengths — not keywords. Each recommendation arrives as a brief that cites the evidence: the publications, awards, and facilities that make you competitive.
The solicitation's instructions, evaluation criteria, and format rules become a requirements checklist, every row tied to the exact text it came from — so nothing is missed and nothing is invented.
Where the funding agency allows AI assistance, Edvisable drafts white papers and proposal sections with the PI: suggestions grounded in your verified research documents, each carrying a citation the PI can check. The PI accepts, edits, or rejects every suggestion before it becomes part of the proposal — the science and the judgment stay human. Where an agency restricts AI drafting, the same engine runs in verification-only mode.
Before anything advances, every claim must resolve to a real source: the publication exists, the biosketch is current, the facility description is accurate, the requirement is answered. Stale or unsupported content gets flagged, not shipped.
Structured internal review — the practice a published study associated with roughly double the funding rate — becomes feasible on every submission, because reviewers spot-check sources instead of fact-checking prose from scratch.
Every submission, review comment, and outcome feeds back into the governed memory. Opportunity matching gets sharper and reusable content gets richer with every cycle — your capture memory compounds instead of walking out the door.
One office or institute. Real submissions. Measured on your own numbers — not our marketing.
Your IT office's security questionnaire answered, your proposal archive and public materials ingested, workspace live.
Opportunity matching tuned to your portfolio; first white papers and proposals assembled and verified.
Structured review running on every submission; your team working the full workflow on live deadlines.
Decision data: hours saved per submission, review coverage, and what your team wants to keep. You decide with numbers.
Bring a live solicitation to the first conversation — we'll show you what Edvisable does with it.
Book a pilot conversation